Next you will be saying Sieg Heil

The cancel culture that we are seeing today is the equivalent of book burning.

Book burning has been going on for centurys, always for nefarious reasons. The one we related to in our time happened in 1933. In Berlin and anywhere else Nazi forces lead burning of thousands of books. “The old goes up in flames, the new shall be fashioned from the flame in our hearts”, So said Nazi propaganda minister Joseph Goebbels.

Today the Cancel Culture is burning any speech or ideas that do not fit their vision, they are using technology and our far left education system to do it.

Facebook and Twitter, filter out unwanted posts. Become a pain for them they just cancel you account and prevent you from even being present. Conservative voices are not allowed to speak on the majority of campuses across the continent, Students either pressure sponsoring groups to cancel speakers, or the block or otherwise disrupt to cancel out the event.

Our American History is being rewritten, history texts being modified. Childrens books are being banned Dr. Seuss did not survive.

The poet, philosopher and political theorist John Milton, wrote “Books are not absolutely dead things, but do contain a potency of life in them to be as active as the soul was whose progeny they are” Milton further said “Anyone who kills a man kills a reasonable creature, God’s image, but he who destroys a good book kills reason itself”.

Today we hear the word Intersectionality, White privilege, and Race, if you can’t see the world thru those lenses then you must be canceled.

From Dictionary.com.

Book Burning a noun

The destruction of writings of which the subject, the view of the author , or the like is considered politically or socially objectionable: USED AS A MEANS OF CENSORSHIP OR OPPRESSION.

If that is what you want, then let it happen. Just be prepared to live under a totalitarian government.

A way to combat the cancel culture.

If you look at a map of the red states in this country, you will see that those states contain, Americas bread basket. Where wheat, corn, soy beans, and other grains are grown. They are also where most of the meat is raised.

So what if these food producers formed a mutual, and every one sold to the mutual, rather than directly to food manufactures. Meat processors had to buy form the mutual, rather than directly form the farm.

The mutual in turn would sell openly to foreign markets, where the end products were to be sold in foreign countries.. However, in the United States, it would only sell to manufactures and processors who could validate that the were not of a liberal bent. Meaning neither the company or it’s management where not contributors to liberal parties or candidates of more than 25% of there total political contributions and they did not support the liberal agenda. In turn those manufactures and processors would not be allowed to sell there goods to liberal retailers or other distributors who distributed to the end user. If they did they would be cut off. Thus meaning that only food available to consumers was passing through conservative leaning channels.

That would mean that companies like Ben and Jerry’s would not be able to buy raw materials to make ice cream. Companies like Costco, would find it difficult to fill there shelves.

As long as liberals have no regard for our first amendment right to free speech. Then the growers of America should have no regard for a liberals need for food. Let there liberal retailers shelves go bear. Turn the screws until it hurts. Oh, big tech, let there cafeteria’s go dry.

At the retail level if they can identify a shopper who is liberal refuse to sell to them. If a shopper wants to espouse liberal BS to a clerk, fine cut them off for good. If someone can identify an individual who contributed to a left candidate, fine cut them off.

Put together a group that does nothing by identify individuals and companies who lean left, and publish. They do it to us, we can do it to them.

It is time for conservatives to take a stand, and push back using the same methods and tactics that are being used against us.

When liberals are ready to stop class warfare, then we can talk, till then, game on.

You might laugh a bit at this, however a couple of friends from the Midwest tell me that this is being bantered around and getting louder.

Taking Responsibility

Based on Census Bureau data, young people can virtually assure that they and their families will avoid poverty if they follow three elementary rules for success – complete at least a high school education, work full time, and wait until age 21 AND get married before having a baby.

Based on an analysis of Census data, people who followed all three of these rules had only a 2 percent chance of being in poverty and a 72 percent chance of joining the middle class (defined as above $55,000 in 2010).

These numbers are almost precisely reversed for people who violated all three rules, elevating their chance of being poor to 77 percent and reducing their chance of making the middle class to 4 percent. Individual effort and good decisions about the big events in life are more important than government programs. Call it blaming the victim if you like, but decisions made by individuals are paramount in the fight to reduce poverty and increase opportunity in America. The nation’s struggle to expand opportunity will continue to be an uphill battle if young people do not learn to make better decisions about their future.

It is called taking responsibility for your life and acknowledging that your life is your responsibility.

Congressional Testimony:

http://federalsafetynet.com/articles-on-poverty/a-98-proof-plan-to-stay-out-of-poverty1?fbclid=IwAR00gEzE6lbCKZmfh02k4uDLAIb7BUee010fXspgPNQN7_klsUoQFiFlCP8